SINGLE BIGGEST SOLUTION TO ELIMINATE POLICE BRUTALITY AND MURDER


SINGLE BIGGEST SOLUTION TO ELIMINATE POLICE BRUTALITY AND MURDER

The single, most important action we can take to eliminate police brutality and murder is to decriminalize non-violent misdemeanors.

We need a federal law decriminalizing all non-violent misdemeanors. If a person fails to appear for a misdemeanor court date, then that person’s driver’s license is suspended until the absentee shows up to court to resolve their misdemeanor case.

The great majority of police excessive force complaints would have never occurred had all non-violent misdemeanors been decriminalized. I cannot emphasize this enough.

A majority of 911 calls DO NOT REQUIRE dispatching armed, uniformed officers. The great majority of 911 calls are non-violent, non-emergency issues, medical assistance issues, non-violent domestic issues.

If we eliminate non-violent misdemeanor arrests, we categorically eliminate the great majority of police brutality/murder cases.

Did you know the nationwide average for felony arrest per officer is approx. one felony arrest per year?

Most of the arrests an officer makes annually and in his or her career are misdemeanor arrests.

Felony arrests per officer are far less frequent than most people realize: eliminate all non-violent misdemeanors from arrest and you just eliminated the great majority of all police brutality/murder cases.

The Scale of Misdemeanor Justice: “The first notable fact the data reveal is no surprise: the volume of misdemeanor cases is very high. By the NCSC’s accounting, misdemeanor cases represent approximately three-quarters of the criminal justice cases processed in the United States.”

Instead of an officer arresting you for a non-violent misdemeanor offense, the officer issues you a citation with a court date. Then, if and when one fails to appear in court on a misdemeanor case, your driver’s license is suspended – you’re unable to renew until you go to court and clear up your misdemeanor case.

This federal law would eliminate the possibility of police brutality and murder during non-violent misdemeanor events/arrests.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

ABOLISH AND REPLACE 18,000 POLICE DEPARTMENTS WITH A FEDERAL POLICE FORCE ONE-THIRD THE SIZE OF ALL 18,000 POLICE DEPTS. COMBINED

Why reduce the size by one-third? Because virtually every police chief in every major city will tell you that over half of all 911 calls DO NOT REQUIRE AN ARMED OFFICER RESPONSE, that’s why.

THE SOLUTION is to pass a federal amendment creating a national police force while simultaneously disbanding all 18,000 police departments.

It is essential one realize you are not going to “fix” these 18,000 police departments one at a time.

It is essential one recognize that institutionalized racism, bad department/municipal policies and practices permeate virtually every single one of the 18,000 police departments in America.

Take the problem of police unions protecting accused cops from justice, the problem of institutionalized racism, the problem of police investigating police, and multiply these problems by 18,000 police depts. and one can see the difficulty.

THE POLICE PROBLEM is solved by federalizing our nations’ 18,000 police departments under one federal police force operating under federal guidelines, hiring & disciplinary practices including Dept. of Justice oversight of citizen complaints against officers.

This new “Federal Police Force” would handle 911 emergency calls involving violence or credible threat of violence. You could bring a police chief from each major city to testify to Congress the FACT that well below 50% of all 911 calls require armed personnel response. The great majority of 911 calls need UNARMED COMMUNITY RESPONSE – not an armed “Federal Police Force” response.

The benefits of operating a “Federal Police Force” are immense:

*approx. one-third the size of all 18,000 police depts. in the aggregate;

*frees up half a municipal budget for each city due to the elimination of a municipality’s police budget; currently and traditionally, over half of a city’s budget goes to the local police department;

*brand new hiring and training practices, including robust, innovative psychological profiling of police candidates;

*U.S. Justice Dept. replacing “cops investigating cops” investigating and prosecuting use of force complaints;

*Local prosecution of police officers under local/state laws are a waste of time, money and energy; instead, police officers should be indicted, prosecuted, convicted and sentenced under U.S.C. TITLE 18, SEC. 242 in a federal courtroom;

The concept of a new “Federal Police Force” features federal law enforcement of our civil and constitutional rights.

Perhaps you’re not familiar with one of the most, if not the most important federal law on the books: U.S.C. TITLE 18, SEC. 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law.

The law is straightforward: Basically any person acting under color of law who violates a person’s civil/constitutional rights is guilty of violating this law and it carries a minimum penalty of one year in federal prison and up to life in prison, depending upon the severity of the violation.

Police officers, elected or unelected officials, nursing home administrators, anyone whose employment position requires one to follow a set of local, county, state or federal laws, rules, regulations or guidelines is a PERSON ACTING UNDER COLOR OF LAW.

Every person acting under color of law OWES A STATUTORY AND CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY to uphold the constitutional rights of any person they encounter in the course of their employment.

When a person acting under color of law violates a person’s constitutional rights, they violate U.S.C. TITLE 18, SEC. 242 and are subject to be prosecuted and sent to federal prison under said federal law. Penalty range is from one year in federal prison up to life in prison, depending upon the severity of the offense.

This is what is missing in America, in Washington, in Americans’ lives.

We replace the 18,000 police departments with one federal police force approximately one-third the size of all 18,000 police depts.

Why reduce the size by one-third? Because virtually every police chief in every major city will tell you that over half of all 911 calls DO NOT REQUIRE AN ARMED OFFICER RESPONSE, that’s why.

Yes, the benefits of instituting a brand new federal police force would include:

ENDING POLICE BRUTALITY/MURDER

It is essential one realize that institutionalized racism, bad police policies and practices permeate virtually all 18,000 police departments in America.

It is essential that one realize we cannot “fix” these problems one police dept. at a time, or even a hundred departments at once.

It is essential that one realize no single event: be it a protest, jury trial or press conference, will stop people of color from being abused, injured and murdered from rogue racist cops.

Rogue racist cops know HOW to game the system to literally get away with assault and murder. Rogue racist cops compare “Kill notes” and form a bond amongst fellow rogue officers with racist tendencies or straight up shameless racist cops. It has been estimated that approximately 20% of the Capitol rioters were law enforcement-based individuals.

A retired black cop once informed me that about one-third of cops are really bad cops; but reality is, another one-third of cops can go bad when they work a shift with the “bad cops.” It’s blue monkey see, blue monkey do in the Blue Wave.

People of color should realize local and state officials are generally not your friends, as many state and local governments are filled with racists willing to inject their own racist beliefs in formulating or rejecting government policies.

Operating a local police department can easily take up over half a municipality’s annual budget. Imagine the community benefit if that municipality did not have to pay for a local police dept? Such fiscal reality would literally free up half a city’s budget in many cases. But replace it with what?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

If Stephen Miller Is Agreeing With You, You Might Be Wrong!

Continued >>>

Tenth Amendment Claims Regarding Federal Benefits

Conservative governors routinely cite the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as legitimate excuse for denying federal benefits to the residents of their state. I hope some resident of Montana, Arkansas or South Carolina files a federal lawsuit challenging their state governor denying them access to federal benefits under the American Rescue Plan; namely the […]

Continued >>>

Anand Giridharadas Quotations

“A successful society is a progress machine. It takes in the raw material of innovations and produces broad human advancement. America’s machine is broken. When the fruits of change have fallen on the United States in recent decades, the very fortunate have basketed almost all of them.” ― Anand Giridharadas, Winners Take All: The Elite […]

Continued >>>